The narrator’s mental
division points to conscience as one of the underlying themes of “Shooting an
Elephant.” The narrator must do his duty as a colonial policeman. He despises
the native Burmese for loathing and tormenting him as their foreign oppressor;
yet he also perfectly well understands their loathing and tormenting; he even
takes their side privately. His official position, rather than his moral
disposition, compels the narrator to act in the way that he does, so as to
uphold his office precisely by keeping the native Burmese in their subordinate
and dependent place. As a colonial official, the narrator must not let himself
become a spectacle before the native crowds. Not shooting the elephant would
make him seem like a coward, so he shoots the elephant. The narrator’s moral conscience
appears in the moment when the corpse of the Burmese crushed by the elephant
comes to his attention; the narrator says that the man lay sprawled in a
“crucified” posture, invoking all of the poignant and rich symbolism that the
term “crucified” offers. The elephant, too, especially in its pain-wracked
death, evokes in the narrator feelings of terrible pity, not soothed by his
knowledge that he acted within the law. Law, indeed, opposes conscience in
“Shooting an Elephant.” The brute fact of Empire, thoroughly institutionalized,
is irreconcilable with the individual’s moral
No comments:
Post a Comment